RIT BBS

タイトル	： 763779
投稿日	： 2024/05/16(Thu) 11:18:18
投稿者	： jadis da 88
参照先	： https://da888.wiki/

The DA88 conforms to that profile and sounds as good as any 16-bit
digital system I have ever used. Projected head-life for the
DA88 was unspecified at the time of writing, but a company source was willing to project 'longer than analogue' and a head-replacement cost 'cheaper than analogue'.

In real work, I don't think I would ever actually allow this to occur,
but it was interesting to see the DA88 pass the test.
The cumulative head-drum rotation time is actually monitored by the system, the figure being available on interrogation via the software.

The fact that both machines use different tape formats is also less relevant than some of the
publicity might lead you to believe - though both manufacturers put
forward an excellent case for why their format is the logical one to adopt, the reality appears to be that both are well-conceived, viable systems and that only time will tell which is the most reliable.
I must go on the record at the outset as saying that I don't really see Tascam's DA88 as a
direct equivalent of the Alesis ADAT - though the fact that both are digital 8-track recorders retailing at a similar price must invite some comparison.

- 関連一覧ツリー （▼ をクリックするとツリーを一括表示します）

- 返信フォーム （この記事に返信する場合は下記フォームから投稿して下さい）

おなまえ
Ｅメール
タイトル
メッセージ
> The DA88 conforms to that profile and sounds as good as any 16-bit > digital system I have ever used. Projected head-life for the > DA88 was unspecified at the time of writing, but a company source was willing to project 'longer than analogue' and a head-replacement cost 'cheaper than analogue'. > > In real work, I don't think I would ever actually allow this to occur, > but it was interesting to see the DA88 pass the test. > The cumulative head-drum rotation time is actually monitored by the system, the figure being available on interrogation via the software. > > The fact that both machines use different tape formats is also less relevant than some of the > publicity might lead you to believe - though both manufacturers put > forward an excellent case for why their format is the logical one to adopt, the reality appears to be that both are well-conceived, viable systems and that only time will tell which is the most reliable. > I must go on the record at the outset as saying that I don't really see Tascam's DA88 as a > direct equivalent of the Alesis ADAT - though the fact that both are digital 8-track recorders retailing at a similar price must invite some comparison.
参照先
暗証キー (英数字で8文字以内)
投稿キー （右画像の数字を入力）

プレビュー

- WebForum -

おなまえ
Ｅメール
タイトル
メッセージ > The DA88 conforms to that profile and sounds as good as any 16-bit > digital system I have ever used. Projected head-life for the > DA88 was unspecified at the time of writing, but a company source was willing to project 'longer than analogue' and a head-replacement cost 'cheaper than analogue'. > > In real work, I don't think I would ever actually allow this to occur, > but it was interesting to see the DA88 pass the test. > The cumulative head-drum rotation time is actually monitored by the system, the figure being available on interrogation via the software. > > The fact that both machines use different tape formats is also less relevant than some of the > publicity might lead you to believe - though both manufacturers put > forward an excellent case for why their format is the logical one to adopt, the reality appears to be that both are well-conceived, viable systems and that only time will tell which is the most reliable. > I must go on the record at the outset as saying that I don't really see Tascam's DA88 as a > direct equivalent of the Alesis ADAT - though the fact that both are digital 8-track recorders retailing at a similar price must invite some comparison.
参照先
暗証キー	(英数字で8文字以内)
投稿キー	（右画像の数字を入力）